Showing posts with label sarah palin and donald trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sarah palin and donald trump. Show all posts

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Rolling Blunder bus tour: Sarah Palin recycles old lies: "Alaska provides 20% of US energy supply", "ethic charges were going to bankrupt our state"

By Patrick

Sarah Palin's Rolling Blunder bus tour has just started, and her lies and her utterly stupid remarks begin to pile up like dirty laundry. It's almost impossible to keep count. Sarah Palin is self-destructing herself again, reliably and relentlessly.

For example - with the following new clip, you could play a game called "Count the lies!"




Believe it or not, but Sarah Palin recycled her old lie from the 2008-campaign that "Alaska provides 20% of the US energy supply!"

Already in September 2008, factcheck.org called Sarah Palin out on this statement, which according to factcheck.org is "energetically wrong":

Palin claims Alaska "produces nearly 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy." That’s not true.

Alaska did produce 14 percent of all the oil from U.S. wells last year, but that’s a far cry from all the "energy" produced in the U.S.

Alaska’s share of domestic energy production was 3.5 percent, according to the official figures kept by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

And if by "supply" Palin meant all the energy consumed in the U.S., and not just produced here, then Alaska’s production accounted for only 2.4 percent.

But what's even worse: With this statement, Sarah Palin wanted to prove to the assembled "lamestream" media that she is an energy expert. A fifth grader would have done a better job. The media will need collective psychotherapy once this whole comedy is over. The nation as well (at least I would recommend it).

However, it ain't over yet. Sarah Palin also claims in this clip that the "frivolous ethics charges were going to bankrupt" Alaska, and that's why she quit! Bankrupt Alaska? Ethics complaints? Alaska has a $ 8.2 billion budget!

Thankfully, the Anchorage Daily News counted the costs in 2009 and came to the following conclusion:

Ethics complaints against Gov. Sarah Palin and top members of her administration have cost the state personnel board nearly $300,000 over the past year, almost two-thirds of which appear to be from the Troopergate investigation of the governor.

That's according to new figures released by the personnel board, which described them as "independent counsel expenditures." The board hires private lawyers to investigate the complaints. The expenditures were released after the personnel board expressed frustration at the costs of the complaints. Palin has said the state is wasting money trying to resolve "frivolous" complaints against her.

So, it would have just taken a few thousand more ethic complaints to bankrupt the State of Alaska.

The ethics complaints were also "going to bankrupt your family", Sarah? Did you just say that? Ding dong, it's another lie, surprise!

First of all, the investigator Timothy Petumenos revealed in his "Alaska Fund Trust" report from April 27, 2009 that the State of Alaska offered to pay your, Sarah Palin, legal bills, but you refused without giving a good reason.

Second, as the Anchorage Daily News also observed in July 2009:

The bulk of the expenses – $187,797 – appear to stem from Troopergate, the messy case involving Palin's former brother-in-law, a state trooper, who got on the wrong side with Palin and her family.

Palin herself initiated at least a part of the ethics case to counter a legislative investigation into the same matter. An additional Troopergate ethics complaint was brought by the state troopers union, which complained Palin and others improperly disclosed confidential personnel and workers' compensation records of her former brother-in-law, Mike Wooten, and engaged in systematic efforts to have Wooten fired. The personnel board dismissed the union complaint.

So, Sarah, listen: About 63% of all the costs of the State of Alaska were incurred because of the ethics complaint you filed against yourself. That means that roughly 63% of your own costs were also produced because of your own behavior, your own tactical political move. Why didn't you tell the media about these simple facts?

But then, Sarah is not really about facts. Sarah is about Sarah, and nothing else. Just Sarah. Sarah. You could call her Queen Esther if you want, also, too. The woman who doesn't like facts, because facts are a real pain in the ass. Simply Sarah.

So what else happened today?

In New York, Sarah told stupid things about the "Dream Act", and she also said that it's an "institution" to eat Pizza with Donald Trump:




"Think Progress" wrote about her remarks in the above clip:

Actually, the DREAM Act aims to accomplish precisely what Palin described. Under the DREAM Act bill that Republicans killed last December, applicants would have had to go through a rigorous process of background checks, in addition to paying taxes, learning English, and either serving in the military or attending college. They would have then received a “conditional nonimmigrant” status and would be required to “stand in line” for ten years before being granted legal immigrant status. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the same bill would reduce the deficit by $1.4 billion over ten years.

Palin, who has not ruled out the possibility of running for president, set forth an incoherent immigration platform in 2010. When Fox News anchor Bill O’Reilly asked her what she would do about immigration if she ever became “President Palin,” she responded, “Let’s keep it simple and let’s say ‘no, if you were here illegally and if you don’t follow the steps that at some point through immigration reform we’re gonna be able to provide — and that is somehow to allow you to work — if you don’t do that, then you’re gonna be gone.’” Palin seemed to suggest that for those who follow the rules, “there has to be that expectation that they will work and that they will contribute.”

Keeping the daily insanity in mind, I thought this tweet was very appropriate:


Sarah Palin truly is the "Media Whore", as Gawker reported today - somebody dared to insult the Queen (click to enlarge):



Here is a video clip of the "incident":



Also, who wouldn't like to visit the "Statute of Liberty":


Earlier today, Kathleen reminded me via email that the name "Palin" already has the word "Pain" in it. Well, I think God gave us a sign there...

Just joking. We have to see the funny side. More breaking news today from the "Pizza Summit":



A disaster happened:



Sorry, Palinbots, but Sarah Palin just lost her not-even-announced presidential run!

LOL!




More nice footage, courtesy of AP:




It seems that Sarah really starts to enjoy talking to the "lamestream" again - no surprise, taken the fact into account that the reporters say very nice and quite silly things to her, for example calling her "a global celebrity", as in the following clip. Oh yes, she hops off the bus to "meet the hometown characters in some of these small towns":




But whatever, Sarah, you have already lost - take a good look at the real American:


Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Sarah Palin -- A Trump Palin Ticket? That Sounds Exciting.

By Kathleen

Dear mainstream media, please stop asking Palin whether or not she is running. The question is getting old and she is not going to tell you one way or the other because then the game would be over and the media could get back to considering real issues.

Issues that matter, such as the fact that Fukushimya is still spewing radiation or that the chemicals sprayed in the Gulf in order to disperse the oil from last year's disastrous oil spill are proving to have caused more damage to the eco system and residents health than the oil ever would have done.

However, rather than informing viewers and readers about such real concerns, in a scene resembling the Whacky Races, media convoys instead chase Sarah Palin's gas guzzling, emission spewing RV up and down the Schuylkill Expressway as she and her family continue their on the road, magical history bus tour.





The tour ultimately ends the day with the familiar sights, sounds and smells of Marriott Hotels and pizza parlors all paid for and sanctioned by the FEC through donations to SarahPac as she has not declared that she is a candidate for anything. Yet!

Donald Trump and Sarah got together as "friends" and he would love for Sarah to run. Sarah, when questioned thinks that a Trump Palin ticket sounds exciting. Just think about what they together could achieve for the economy and international relations..........





Jon Stewart believes that Sarah Palin's tour "really does seem like a political campaign" and is puzzled by the fact that Sarah Palin still has her job as a Fox news analyst when other people such as Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum "lost their jobs." Samantha explains that the same rules do not apply to Sarah.




Today, Roger Simon at Politico reveals that he was attacked by both blogs and the mainstream media for suggesting in a column that he wrote in June, 2010 that “Sarah Palin can be the Republican nominee in 2012. I am not saying she will be, but she can be. Those who underestimate her do so at their own risk.” He still believes that Palin has been underestimated and that Palin's name recognition and strong stance on government spending and power can win her the GOP nomination. I believe that there is another route that Palin could take. That of the third party.

In case there is any doubt Palin confirmed earlier to Greta Van Susteren that she is part of the private incorporated company, Safari Inc., that purchased the mansion in Arizona. In an interview with KPHO, Jaime Molera, one of Arizona's leading political analysts, thinks that the mansion will act as a base for Palin's political ambitions and that she has not purchased the property because she wants some extra sunshine as she claims. He points out that Arizona has many more electoral votes than Alaska, that it votes early in the primaries and that these factors could prove useful to her if Palin decides to run for President.


“Arizona gives her a good base if she decides that because it’s a growing state. The GOP primaries of the West are important and I think this gives her a good platform to run on.”

“She doesn’t have to travel all the way up to Alaska where there are hardly any electoral votes. Arizona is going to have 11 or 12 electoral votes, and because it’s a growing state and has one of the early primaries, it gives her a good base to talk about not just Arizona issues, but Western issues and things that might resonate with the GOP voters,” said Molera.


I think that Molera makes some significant observations and understands the real reasons behind Palin's move to Arizona, and they have absolutely nothing to do with tanning and chilling.