Saturday, April 27, 2013

Sarah Palin's "pregnancy" with Trig: Revealing email exchanges with two liberal journalists

Both pictures in high-resolution (click below):
Photo March 26, 2008
Photo April 13, 2008

By Patrick

Time for a short, but also informative weekend post! Yes, it again concerns one of our favourite issues, the faked pregnancy of master-fraudster and Ex-Gov and Ex-VP candidate Sarah Palin! We just cannot get enough of it! It is so addictive to write about a subject that virtually the whole media has chosen to ignore. Maybe the media has chosen this path so that their audience won't be overly concerned about the integrity of the political class! (snark)

I recently had email exchanges with two very well know liberal journalists about Sarah Palin's "pregnancy" with Trig. You all know these two journalists. I won't reveal their names or give any hints, and please do not start to guess in the comments. It is not the first time that I posted quotes from email conversations with a journalist about the pregnancy, without revealing the identity of the journalist, of course.

The identities of these two journalists, who both are prominent and have a national audience, is not important, but the content of their messages is incredibly revealing indeed.

Therefore I would like to present a few quotes from these recent exchanges.

"Journalist No 1" wrote the following to me, after I explained to the journalist what our blog is all about:

Thanks for your very candid response. To be equally candid, I am in the opposite camp and think this kind of theory is hurtful to liberals in that it does place the left in the wacky conspiracy column. I don't doubt your sincerity, though, but you are also talking about something that is six years old and no longer relevant; Palin, herself, has lost relevancy. Given how it is such a narrow niche and so old, I'm not sure why you would want your site to have the ongoing association when the news, and the world, has moved on from Palin.

I like this response pretty much (don't agree with it, of course), as it is a great example of the attitude of the liberal media towards the "Trig question" - an attitude that Andrew Sullivan, the "most prominent Trig doubter", according to "Salon", heavily criticized in the past: "This is your liberal media, ladies and gentlemen: totally partisan, interested in the truth only if it advances their agenda, and devoid of any balls whatsoever."

So let's move on to the second exchange ("Journalist No 1" was not in the mood for further conversation, by the way). The quotes from the second exchange are a real "shocker." Too bad that the American public does not know what their journalists DO know!

"Journalist No 2:"

Everybody knows that pregnancy was faked.

That Salon story was RIDICULOUS.

Haha - I had to take a deep breath after I received this email!

"Journalist No 2" of course referred to the infamous "definite debunker", written by Justin Elliott, which appeared at "Salon" in 2011.

I then asked the journalist to clarify who "everybody" is.

"Journalist No 2" answered:

Everyone *I know* knows that baby is not Palin's.

If this is not educational, I do not know what is!

Too bad that no investigative journalist had the balls to fully expose the fraudster Sarah Palin. Of course we do not want to forget to mention that Andrew Sullivan and Joe McGinniss came close to exposing her, and that Professor Brad Scharlott did everything he could to push the issue into the mainstream.

The exchange with "journalist No 2" showed that Sarah Palin actually hasn't fully gotten away with her fraud, but that many journalists are in fact aware of it - but won't talk about it in public. The exchange gave me a lot of confidence that it would be virtually impossible for Sarah Palin to run for any kind of office again and to avoid the "Trig question" at the same time.

I would like to conclude this post with some screenshots of recent comments at "Conservatives4Palin", where some commenters "boldly" exposed a long-time member of the C4P-community as a potential "Trig Truther" - it was a hoot! The "exposed member" dared to ask in 2011 at Greta Van Susteren's blog in a comment why Sarah Palin won't provide the birth certificate for Trig! This of course constituted "high treason", and the Palin-fans were up in arms after the "discovery."

Here is the comment in question which "AmazedOne1" left on Greta's website in 2011:

"AmazedOne1" is a "regular" at C4P, as the statistics prove:

Screenshots from C4P after the "exposure" of commented AmazedOne1:

Particularly interesting is this response by "AmazedOne1":

"Well, over a year and half ago, it seemed that it would be an easy and blatantly quick way for her to put the rumours to rest while sticking it in their faces. However, Sarah clearly kniows what she's doing, and has handled it differently than I would have if people were saying thinks like that about me. Instead, she successfully dispels the critics by laughing at them. It works!"

It is interesting to see this type of "rationalization" of Sarah Palin's refusal to provide Trig's birth certificate on a rabid pro-Palin website. In fact, Sarah Palin even once wrongfully claimed to have provided Trig's birth certificate (apparently in an act of desperation) - but this would be too difficult to process for the obsessive Palin-fans who are living in a world of selectively chosen reality.

It would also too difficult to process for them that the notion that Sarah "successfully dispels the critics by laughing at them", which "works", is evidently wrong. Such an idea ignores the basic fact that Sarah Palin even went so far as to send a six-page attorney letter to Northern Kentucky University, the employer of "Trig Truther" Professor Brad Scharlott, as Politicalgates revealed in December 2012. Enclosed to this long, rambling letter were about 100 pages of documents - but crucially, no copy of a birth certificate.

So, if it "works" for her, why does Sarah Palin spent hundreds, if not thousands on dollars on such an excessive lawyer letter? 

The only thing that "works" for Sarah Palin is the refusal of the US media to expose her fraud.

The truth, as we had to learn the hard way, is a precious, delicate and rare flower.

Palin-biographer Joe McGinniss"I think the Politicalgates archives are the best single available resource for anyone wondering why questions are still being asked about Sarah really being Trig’s birth mother." (from August 28, 2011)
Kathleen Baker, editor of Politicalgates, writes in the UK "Guardian" about Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy: "Sarah Palin, unreliable narrator"
Read all posts at Politicalgates about Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy with Trig - FOR THE COLLECTION, CLICK HEREHEREHEREHEREHEREHEREHEREHERE AND HERE.

Download the research paper regarding Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy and the role of the media, written by Brad Scharlott, Associate Professor for Journalism at Northern Kentucky University - CLICK HERE.

Brad Scharlott's revised version of the paper has also been published by "Business Insider."

Read the old post at Palingates about the faked pregnancy with the pictures still intact in hardcopy HERE.

Read the old posts at Palingates online HERE (useful also for watching the video clips which were published with the posts).

Listen to Sarah Palin's own description of her unbelievable "Wild Ride" from Texas to Alaska, which happened on April 17, 2008: Sarah explains how she decided to make the trip, despite of the fact that her "water broke" the night before.

In addition, please don't hesitate to watch the excellent video-documentaries about "babygate" which our reader Lidia17 created - HEREHERE and HERE.

We break the "Spiral of Silence" - Read the details about the "biggest hoax in American political history!"

No comments:

Post a Comment